Overwegingen bij COM(2024)594 - Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the partial suspension of the application of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the facilitation of the issuance of visas - Hoofdinhoud
Dit is een beperkte versie
U kijkt naar een beperkte versie van dit dossier in de EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2024)594 - Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the partial suspension of the application of the Agreement between the European Union and ... |
|---|---|
| document | COM(2024)594 |
| datum | 20 december 2024 |
(2) The purpose of the Facilitation Agreement is to facilitate, on the basis of reciprocity, the issuance of visas for an intended stay of no more than 90 days in any 180‑day period to the citizens of the Union and Georgia. The Facilitation Agreement contributes to the enhancement of people‑to‑people contacts and the sharing of values, including respect for human rights and democratic principles.
(3) Under Article 14(5) of the Facilitation Agreement, each Party is entitled to suspend the Facilitation Agreement in whole or in part for reasons of public order, protection of national security or protection of public health. The decision on suspension is to be notified to the other Party not later than 48 hours before its entry into force. The Party that has suspended the application of the Facilitation Agreement is to immediately inform the other Party once the reasons for the suspension no longer apply.
(4) In 2024, Georgia adopted the ‘Law on transparency of foreign influence’ and the legislative package on ‘family values and protection of minors’. This legislation undermines the fundamental rights of the Georgian people, including the freedom of association and expression, the right to privacy, the right to participate in public affairs, and increases stigmatisation and discrimination.
(5) The European Council underlined in its conclusions of 27 June 2024 that the ‘Law on transparency of foreign influence’ represents backsliding on the steps set out in the Commission’s recommendation for candidate status and called on Georgia’s authorities to clarify their intentions by reversing a course of action which jeopardises Georgia’s path towards the European Union, de facto leading to a halt of the accession process. In its conclusions of 17 October 2024, the European Council reaffirmed that such a course of action jeopardises Georgia’s European path and de facto halts the accession process, and called on Georgia to adopt democratic, comprehensive and sustainable reforms, in line with the core principles of European integration.
(6) On 28 November 2024, the Georgian authorities announced the intention not to seek the opening of accession negotiations with the European Union until 2028. This announcement provoked mass protests in numerous Georgian cities, to which the Georgian authorities responded with the use of disproportionate force and violent methods as well as arbitrary arrests and ill-treatment of protesters, politicians and journalists.
(7) The actions taken by Georgia breach the fundamental principles on which the Facilitation Agreement was concluded and go against the interests of the Union and its Member States. In particular, these actions do not respect human rights and democratic principles and thereby are in contradiction with Union values and hamper the steady development of economic, humanitarian, cultural, scientific and other ties between the Union and Georgia.
(8) Against this background, the Commission’s 7th Report under the Visa Suspension Mechanism10 highlighted the steps to be taken urgently by Georgia to address the Commission’s concerns and noted that there are ongoing reflections on the activation of the visa suspension mechanism in relation to certain categories of persons.
(9) In order to protect the public order of the Member States and of the Union, it is appropriate and proportionate that Member States require a visa from Georgian citizens holding valid diplomatic passports who travel to the European Union, as these persons represent interests which are contrary to those that led the Union to conclude the Facilitation Agreement in the first place. The application of certain provisions of the Facilitation Agreement providing for exemptions for citizens of Georgia holding valid diplomatic passports and for facilitations for certain categories of citizens of Georgia applying for a short-stay visa, namely members of Georgian official delegations, members of national and regional Governments and Parliaments of Georgia, the Constitutional and Supreme Court of Georgia, in the exercise of their duties, should therefore be suspended.
(10) This Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC11; Ireland is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
(11) In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
(12) In view of the gravity of the situation in Georgia, this Decision should enter into force as soon as possible.