C-437/17 - Gemeinsamer Betriebsrat EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach, preliminary ruling Oberster Gerichtshof - Austria

1.

Huidige status

Deze zaak is gesloten op 13/03/2019.
 

2.

Kerninformatie

Zaak C-437/17
Vorming van de rechtbank
  • Fifth Chamber
Aanvrager Gemeinsamer Betriebsrat EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH Defendant: EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH Question referred Are Article 45 TFEU and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 1 on freedom of movement for workers to be interpreted as precluding a national provision such as that in the main proceedings (Paragraph 3(2)(1) in conjunction with Paragraph 3(3) and Paragraph 2(1) of the Urlaubsgesetz (Law on holidays, ‘the UrlG’)), under which a worker who has a total of 25 years of service, but has not completed these with the same Austrian employer, is entitled to only five weeks of annual holiday, whereas a worker who has completed 25 years of service with the same Austrian employer is entitled to six weeks of holiday per year. ____________1 Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union, OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1.
Verweerder EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH Question referred Are Article 45 TFEU and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 1 on freedom of movement for workers to be interpreted as precluding a national provision such as that in the main proceedings (Paragraph 3(2)(1) in conjunction with Paragraph 3(3) and Paragraph 2(1) of the Urlaubsgesetz (Law on holidays, ‘the UrlG’)), under which a worker who has a total of 25 years of service, but has not completed these with the same Austrian employer, is entitled to only five weeks of annual holiday, whereas a worker who has completed 25 years of service with the same Austrian employer is entitled to six weeks of holiday per year. ____________1 Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union, OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1.
Datum indiening verzoekschrift 19-07-2017
Datum van levering 13-03-2019

3.

Bronnen en disclaimer

Zie voor uitgebreidere informatie eventueel ook de volgende voor dit zaak-dossier gebruikte bronnen:
Dit zaak-dossier wordt iedere nacht automatisch samengesteld op basis van bovenstaande bronnen. Hierbij is aan de technische programmering veel zorg besteed. Een garantie op de juistheid van de gebruikte bronnen en het samengestelde resultaat kan echter niet worden gegeven.